CSN EP-48 News with M (23andMe National Security Risk-Tesla-AI-Globalists don't want you growing your own food)
Crazy Strange DazeFebruary 07, 202400:54:2074.6 MB

CSN EP-48 News with M (23andMe National Security Risk-Tesla-AI-Globalists don't want you growing your own food)

Hello everyone, and welcome back. This is Crazy Strange News Episode forty eight News with M with shaking M nothing nothing, okay. So we have a bit of a format experiment tonight. Right, we're going to do categories from now on. Yeah, like sections of the newspaper. Yeah, I thought it might be easier for foth, economy, politics, blah blah blah. Yeah, maybe be easier to put them cool, So it goes. Uh you guys, let us know how you like it. You can go ahead and email us at I must send the wrong podcast email Crazy Strange Days da z e at gmail dot com. So let us know if you have a preference after hearing this, of course, So getting right into it, what are we looking at? Let's first up, I guess we'll go into health this category. I mean this article may I don't know if it's necessarily health per se, but it is about your yeah, geonomic, I guess data. So it says there's an inevitable fire sale of twenty three and meters to an overseas pe firm. So that's private equity. I believe that could be a national security risk. Now, this article comes from zero Hedge and most of you who probably know that twenty three and me was a DNA testing company. It is now it hasn't been making any profits recently. I mean, I guess it's a penny stock now. It's lost ninety three percent of its market following it's November twenty twenty one peak. So since November of twenty twenty one, it's lost ninety four percent. Good and basically, I mean, the article comes up and it's a valid point. It says, you know, there's a tweet from Will Menindez. I guess I don't know how you spell it, how do you say it? It's m a n idis. Within months, you'll be able to buy genomics data from fourteen million Americans for plus minus two hundred million dollars. It says, the inevitable fire sale of this mess to an overseas pe firm is going to be a national security matter on the scale of which we haven't seen in healthcare for years. Another X user said, can't wait to see who buys this gigantic pool of genetic data and whatever scheme they come up to monetize it. So, yes, it is a concern because those of you who use that service now that information is being bought by somebody and you don't know what they're going to do with Well, hopefully the government will kind of jump in there and stop to sail, because I mean, you got to keep it in You've got to keep it in the country at the very least. And I'm not saying Chinese own, but in our country. I mean, you know what, scrap it, don't even sell it. Yeah, you know, here we go, right, the Chinese get it. We know the Chinese are responsible for COVID nineteen. We know they like to mess with weaponizing viruses and you know, germ warfare type stuff. And then we had our own facilities in the Ukraine, and there's a lot of rumors that they were trying to genetically predispose their own bio weapons towards certain races, like the Russians, believe it or not, And you know the Chinese. I've heard the Chinese are doing it. I've read somewhere. I mean, every country in the world that has germ warfare programs are trying to genetically tag So if we go to war with China, we can release, you know, a virus that only kills Chinese people, you know, Yeah, so, but totally tagging it it's crazy. But there's a variety of things they could do with it. But it's just it's scary for those who use that service because then that means, you know, you thought your information was going to be private, now it's going to be in it's in the hands of twenty three meters now going to be hands of somebody else later and if they decide to sell it to someone else and another party, I mean, it's just insane. And do you remember who actually do you know who owned that or started that? Yeah, she was related to Google or yeah, I think it was the ork or something, the ex wife of one of the Google founders. Yeah, these guys are all over these You got to watch out for these, these technocrats. Man, they do not have your best interests. That heart I don't believe. But yeah, so heads up, people, if you've given you know, your sample to this company, not that I know, you know, I don't know if it really matters. Like I said, they could be getting our DNA from who knows what. Yeah, when you give blood or anything, yeah, I mean there's there's all kinds of opportunities. And if you if you still trust organizations like the Red Cross or you know, I just don't trust it. I don't trust trust no one, right, I mean, that's that's where we're where I'm at. I'm not heading there. I'm at that point. Yeah, so do what you want. But yeah so I don't know. So just for those of you who haven't done that, you know, maybe you want to think twice before you use one of these companies because you never know where your information is going to end up, right, Yeah So, so just another article here is just just reading the headline really more than just to make people aware. There's a warning has been issued by researchers that link energy drinks to suicidal thoughts and children. I know that some of these energy drinks are so we have such a high level of caffeine and whatever else they put in them that it's way beyond what a normal person should have. But the research basically reveals they pose a really high risk to children and younger people's brains than previously thought. So the article it comes from, we're talking children, Are we talking teenagers or like preteens? What are we talking? I'm not sure. It says younger, younger children or younger people. It says higher risk of mental problems such as a depression, suicidal thoughts, you know, those with ADHD blah blah blah, you know, it says the researcher said they looked at data from fifty seven studies of more than one point two million children and younger people. What do they consider younger people? I don't know, from more than twenty one countries to come up with their conclusion. So that's a pretty big study and across the globe. So I just wonder how it was conducted, you know. But yeah, I mean, you can't be having five cups of coffee in twelve ounces of a cold beverage that you can chug exactly. So it's not good for anybody. So if you want to learn more, we're going to link the article below, but originally it comes from Jack Phillips via the Epic Times. But I'm looking at this or zero hedge. Okay, So next we're going to move into technology. I found this funny one again from zero Hedge. It says companies turn to AI because real intelligence is hard to find sous it says, uh, you know. In the article, which was actually from the thirty first of January, it said UPS today announced it would use artificial intelligence to reduce office workers, and it joins uh, Google, Amazon and others in the shift. You know, UPS is going to cut twelve thousand jobs mainly from I think office workers in general. But towards the bottom of the article, I thought it was really funny because it says real intelligence is hard to find. There's a desperate need for AI government because search for real intelligence turns up empty. That's not surprising, is it. I can't find anybody smart enough in governments, so they're going to use computers. Yeah, so, but yeah, we see AI everywhere and more and more companies are turning to it. So whether it's uh, well I told you that, and I'm gonna I'm not going to bring you know, we're not going to dolve into it too much because I have to read a couple of articles on it. But that GTP four is itching to launch a nuclear missile. Yeah, the chat GBT thing. Yes, Yeah, I'm assuming that's what that means. That chat whatever four is. It must be a next negation. But yeah, you know, and I've got to dig into that because I find that fascinating. I might, you know, save it for next time. But I thought i'd mentioned that since we're kind of digging around because it's like every episode seems to have AI involved, because it's just everywhere right now. Yeah, it's more and more prevalent. There's not a lot of good stuff going on with you know, you have Oh you you read an article to me a few days ago about the guy had a AI on customer service. Oh yeah, yeah, he was telling to swear at him and give him high coupes and yeah, he wasn't getting like he couldn't get a person for his complaints. Yeah, so I guess it was a British kind of like a FedEx or something over in Britain, and he wanted to his package didn't arrive, so he kept trying to he reached out to customer service. Of course, he realized he wanted to talk to a person like most of us do. And you keep saying, you know, person or like representative, and then that keeps giving you an automated menu, you know, and so he started he just got frustrated and finally said, you know, he realized it was AI, and he said, he goes, why don't you swear to me? Swear at me? And then it said, well, it's not in my protocol. He's like, I give you permission, and it did, and then he said, you know, write me a high coup. So he knew it was an AI because a person's probably not gonna come up with a high qu that quick. And then he asked him something about or asked it about the company's service, and it basically said the company's service sucks, and just kept calling on and on and on and then so then the company pulled the AI and said we're gonna we're gonna stop this AI for a little bit until we fine tune in because it obviously doesn't want it to say how bad their service is. So for any of you, if you get frustrated with the customer service, then you know you should try check it out, say write me a high coup. And then he was getting it to say filthy things. Yeah, you know, it was pretty funny, almost like talking dirty. So yeah, AI is fun. We'll have more. I'm sure I've got I'm sitting on a ton of ais. Uh. I just it's just getting it's everywhere. Yeah, it's just getting tedious. You know, it's funny. I like that. Yeah, but you don't know what's real or not. I mean, right, they can, Like we talked about over in you know Asia, they make them news reporters and all this stuff. Yeah, yeah, we even talked about the beginning of the year they have an all supposedly an all AI news network coming out. Nuts yep, I don't know. I mean, yeah, let's take a break from the AI for a while, people. I think it's a scary technology as it is now. I think it needs to be worked out. But if if you're going to be flying anytime soon, the TSA has some more toys up to use against you. Basically, you know, they've got these the latest cat scanners, basically c AT scans, I'm sure that's what that means, but known as a cat too, corporates facial recognition technology by taking real time pictures of travelers and then comparing those images against their photo IDs. We all get it, but there may be some issues with this because that you know, it's not the most well run organization. I guess it technically is a three letter agency now right under Homeland Security. I mean, it's it's a you know, they're not just like part time security guards doing this. I don't fly, I don't I haven't flown in years. So probably fifteen years. I don't plan on doing it either. But yeah, so the TSA, they've got some new toys, and uh, you know, they're trying to assure people that they're not going to collect the data. And I find that kind of you know, do you really believe I don't believe it. I think that even though, Yeah, it's kind of like the need to know. They're getting told that they're not collecting data. But here you go Homeland Security. You know they're gonna behind the scenes and collecting data because that's what they do. The NSA, Homeland Security, the huge building out in the desert with all the servers in it. Yeah, listening to phone calls, listening to recording texts, you know, all this crap. I can't even remember what that's called after I've got to do a show on that. Oh yeah, the Giant and then in the past something. But in the past, it was it was It was basically a really difficult task. I mean, they were collecting all this data, but they didn't have enough manpower for everybody to listen to and read. But now with ani and computers, they can scan this information so fast and get so much information on I heard this probably in the late nineties on an Art Bell show, Miss art Bell and I forget there were two I can't remember the names, but there were like two programs whispered about, and of course course it was like, oh, that's not real, no conspiracy, and that it was real man, people they were recording telephone calls. They were recording and it wasn't text probably facts whatever you could do over a landline. But and then here you go, what's going on now at the NSA Homeland Security that huge server farm out in the you know, and it's supposed to be immense ye, like it's a gigantic building you can see from fricking space. Yeah, but it's nothing but servers with all our data. Your phone call, my phone calls everybody that's listening your phone calls, your texts, and it's looking for keywords like that's where I heard the technology from the r Bell shows, Like you know, it was probably right after nine to eleven, Yeah, because it's looking for keywords like bomber bomb, terrorists, yeah, whatever, you know, those types of things. But it's certainly evault. Then you know, their their tentacles are everywhere. I mean, the CIA will get a piece of this action too, you know it. Everybody they're not supposed to be operate, but they're technically not. This is a loophole. This is what they do everything. You know, so your face will be mapped out if it's not already. I mean, everybody's got to get a photo for their license. Yep, you know so. I mean it's just something to be concerned about, and they do say. TSA is committed to protecting passenger privacy, civil rights, civil liberties, and ensuring the public's trust as it seeks to improve the passenger experience through its exploration of identity identity verification technologies. That's their media release. Facial recognition technology is solely used to automate the current id UH the manual ID checking process and will not be used for surveillance or any law enforcement purposes. It adds TSA uses facial recognition cat too technology only to verify the identity of the traveler at the podium and make a determination for access into physical security screening. No. Yeah, so it's bureaucrats speak type stuff. You know, that's exactly what they think we want to hear. Yeah, it's just more to data collection, like calm down, coombed down photos are not stored or saved after a positive ID match has been made, except in a limited testing environment for evaluation of the effectiveness of the technology. Ding ding ding ding ding. That little last paragraph or little sentence that it's kind of like, yeah, but we do keep it, We keep it for testing. Yeah, how long do you keep it? That's need to know. You know, our testing period is forever indefinitely. So yeah, fun, yeah, fun, enjoy even more fun when you travel by airplane. Yeah, that's never that's I used to love flying. I do not do it now. Yes, No, I get to worry about them taking your face face and storing in a database, as well as sitting on a plane and having the doors fly off your phone getting sucked out the door. Too much fun, all right, So next we want to move into some articles on the environment. So you had something, Yeah, it's over at futurism dot com. I actually like this site, but they are very anti elon Musk. It's a site that deals with a lot of technology and AI and you know transhumanism really you know, implants all these different things genomes and the little robots, the nanobots and all that. But so Tesla's forced to pay Mishandling has for mishandling hazardous waste and what you know. And I'm not anti Elon Musk. I mean, these guys are always that. There's probably eight articles right now on this site just kind of picking at the dude. But it's it's almost like jealousy. I don't know who right who writes the who owns this, but it's probably Zuckerbird. But so, Tesla has been ordered to pay one point five million who a settlement after being sued over mishandling hazardous waste materials at his California facilities. It's all right, he'll just move to Texas anyhow, but a million five come on. So the complaint twenty five California district attorneys argued that the ev maker had intentionally disposed of and intentionally cause the disposal of hazardous waste in locations that were not authorized. So essentially, what they were doing, we're dumping the depleted batteries, which you know, we kind of especially me, when we talk about these things. You talk about the overall picture, but I'm always stuck on these batteries because I know they're just the worst thing for the environment. And you know children mind that does rare earth minerals and they're toxic. Well, I mean everybody knows, even like China, it's basically slave labor in you know One Belt one road that are all over in Africa. But that's where a lot of the minds are, and China's knee deep in that stuff. But I mean, here's just a simple example about how bad the battery. I mean, anything that's got a rechargeable battery. Think about your phone. I mean, that's why they have these, you know, little boxes where you dump your old phones because you're not supposed to throw it away in regular garment. You have to put them in a specific place so they can be disposed of in a specific way because they're toxic. Yeah, and you know, here's here's something. You know, so these these district these twenty five district attorneys in California, and you were you were telling me straight up, you just think, okay, it's it's optics. Yeah, it's optics because they did something wrong. So they have to pay a settlement. Yeah, because what you say, But again, the settlement's one point five million, So an average person would go, oh, well, at least they elon Musk wipes his butt with that. Yeah. No. But what I'm saying is that when you read that, you go, oh, well, they you know, they had to pay for their crimes one point five million, but you said they made over eight billion in the last quarter or something. Company ranked raked in almost eight billion in the fourth quarter of last year one. So that's just the fourth quarter. So there's three more quarters. But just to say that's just let's focus on just that. So one point five million out of eight billion is not even half a percent. So and this is the kind of stuff, like you said. I've mentioned to you before we started, was optics because during the Great Recession and we had all those banks that were fined because of you know, bad practices and fraud and all these things. So they'll be you know, they was articles out everywhere going, oh, they paid a record you know fee before their crimes, like half a million, half a billion dollars or whatever. Right, But if they if the fraud that they did break, you know, basically brought them in let's say a billion dollars and they even paid half a million, they earned fifty percent on their fraudulent activity. So the next time they may go come up with some scheme. They may say, oh, I'm going to make two billion, but I'll pay a billion in fines, but I still walk away with a billion, And nobody goes to jail, because nobody goes to jail on any of these things. They just pay a fine. But then they so they in the future they can go, well, that's fine, I'll pay a fine. Well, if someone cares. It's not the first time either. I mean, they're under scrutiny for many types of pollution, I guess. But in twenty twenty two, they settled with the Environmental Protection Agency for violating a Clean Air Act, forced to pay a penalty of wait for it, two and seventy five thousand dollars. Yep. See, it's it's just a slap on them. It's a tiny like they don't even blink their eye at that. Is that enough to make you like change your policies? That's what I'm saying. All these companies look at what they look at the cost benefit analysis. Right if you're in business and you go, oh, well, you know, yeah, I committed fraud or I did a crime, but nobody went to jail and I paid a fee, but I still made more doing this fraudulent activity than I paid in my fees. I mean, I wonder if a guy like that is even aware of it, he might not be. I'd be playing with my rockets too, you know, and messing with Twitter. Yeah. Look how much money has Yeah, it just buys Twitter. Yeah. So I don't know, but that's what you see all over the place. You know, it's just optics these big companies because the you know, we know how they know that a move to Texas. Yeah, but we know like how dirty long these politicians and things are, so they're you know, they don't they're not going to go after these big companies because you know, they they donate to their campaign and what that's just one of the plants, right, because he does the headquarters is in Texas now right, I believe, yes, he did SpaceX two or whatever. So you know, he's not given a crap. Yeah, so why don't they make him like clean up the land or I mean, there should be other stipulations with this, you know, because it's not about but if the EPA has to do it, you Landry clemb but obviously EPA doesn't do it. Let's go into the next article, which is East Palestine, right, So here we go. That's local pretty close to us and optics once more, you know, I mean not close close, but I mean it's in you know, in Ohio. But but it's like they again, both the federal and Ohio e p A said, oh, there's nothing to see here. And the people locally are saying, I've got rashes on my skin, i got cancer, They're getting all these things. Yeah, there's a local doctor that was being interviewed and I was at these nation or something, but anyhow, he was saying, yeah, I even had I had diarrhea, I've had you know, these rashes, headaches. You know, he's talking about symptoms of his patients. You know, obviously he can't you know, but he was saying, there's just he was just rattling them off and he and he also said that geez, they're isotopes or something. Isotopes is that the right word. But there is benzene. What is that chloride some hard in the vinyl in the in the certain vinyl like people, it's turning up in the bloodstream. So I don't know what that means long term, is that you know, cancer producing the chemicals. I would imagine too, so you know, and they're showing the water. They said, the waters, everything's fine, but these people are showing the dead fish still like and there's videos. And then if you hit the bottom, yeah, they say, stick all this oil slick. Yeah. So if you just look at it, it might look okay. But if you stick a stick in there, like you said post, yeah, they're not even agitating it that much. And it looks like most people would see the gasoline rainbow swirls and stuff and a puddle at a gas station. Yep, that's what it looks like on the surface of the water once you disturb the bottom. Yeah, so everything this is settling to the bottom just because you know, that's why things, that's what things do. They you know, settle until they best. That all runs into the Ohio River. Ye, that's right near the Ohio River, and so that means it's all run all ditch stream whatever. So it is all running downhill to the Ohio and then running to the states below the salt States that it runs into the Mississippi and goes down to the Gulf of Mexico. So yeah, we'll see everybody's getting you know, Ohio as opposed to when we were kids, like the creeks and stuff. You really didn't catch any fish in those creeks. No, But as of the last twenty five thirty years, with all the mills getting cleaned and you know, closing gadging the river and the creeks and stuff, there people are catching like record breaking muskie and northern pike and stuff. And these these fisheries basically, these rivers and lakes and streams. So now I wonder and we have our wildlife back too. You know in town you'd see a fox every once in a while, only never saw hawks or foxes or any of that crap. Like in the city, the edges of the city because of all the steel mills. So they all got tore up and cleaned up, and yeah, reclamation project dredging, and so now those poor people down there and other like you said, down anything downstream, I don't know how much it's going to affect Kentucky or you know wherever wherever that's going as it go past. Yeah, Memphis and stuff, I guess the Mississippi. Yeah, And then they had basically the article said as well that the mayor down there said, you know, he doesn't want Joe Biden because finally nobody, I think Biden finally says he may come visit. Yeah, he made a comment. I think Kirby, you know, cabble Kirby the spokes he gets like half the stuff because Jean Pierre, Corinne John Pierre or whatever is like a terrible liar, which is not as good as gasoline colored hair. Lady Jen Saki, Saki is so uh. You know, they were asking about schedule or is he going to Dover air forase. I think it's Dover where we receive our our dat America soldiers. Yeah, and he's like, nothing was on the schedule yet, and they asked that he's going to East Palestine that's on the schedule sometime, you know, blah blah blah. And then he made a comment and now everybody, Ohio, I can't wait to see personally, because we're within sixty miles, we share the same local news. We're gonna know the reaction of people the local radio station. People will be calling in. I will be listening, you know, with popcorn, just listening to the crap show that this is going to be. But you know, yeah, I mean it's I don't know the mayor there basically said that he that he yeah, and that's a mayor. What, Yeah, that's the mayor. Imagine just the normal Joe. No. But he basically said he told made a comment that he doesn't want him to come visit now. He said, come visit me on your book tour. Yeah, saying like, when you lose the presidency this upcoming year, then you can come. You know, don't come down. People are going to be flipping his motorcade off. It's going to be terrible. Yeah. I mean this is Ohio, that's Appalachia, so oh they're tough down there too. It should be fun. Yeah. And then I had one last one. This one comes from also Zero had just as globalists will use carbon controls to stop you from growing your own food. Oh I saw that, so it you know, obviously was a link to another an article authored by this Brandon Smith via the Alt Market US. But uh, you know, he he kind of starts the article talking about and I remember when this happened during COVID. You know, he's like, remember when Whittner Whitmer, the governor of Michigan, She basically used COVID as an opportunity to institute Some bizarre limitations in the public include a mandate barring larger stores from selling seeds and garden supplies to customers. I remember when we saw the weirdest thing. Yeah, you could go buy paint, but you couldn't buy seeds. Yeah, and they like put like they draped or bagged over the displays. Yeah, so no one could buy it was out lawed. Yeah, and it's like, why can't you carry a seat a pack of two dollars seeds tomato seeds in the middle of the COVID You were stuck at your home. You weren't allowed to leave. So some people were like, I might as well make a little garden. They're like, no, not in Michigan. You weren't allowed to buy seeds. So very odd. There's a lot of bizarre things about Michigan. That whole uh that's said the FBI set up those dumb people. Yeah, kidnapped Whitmer and you know, they didn't plan any of it. They didn't really agree to it. Like have you ever dove into the in Like the head FBI dude got kicked out. He was like, I don't know, there's all kinds of crap about that. He's out of the FBI. Now, yeah, but the people that ran that op to catch white supremacist Trump trumpsters, Yeah, guess what they what was their next op? Jan six? Oh, they got promotions and stuff. Yeah, DC, you know, Special Agent d C and you know all this crap. So they just laid their trap almost the same thing. Yeah, at a much larger scale. Yeah. So but he's just talking that you know this, and then he goes on to say, you know, another prospect that was being openly discussed amongst globalists was the idea that lockdowns were helpful and many in ways beyond stopping the spread of COVID. So they suggested that these measures could be effective in preventing carbon emissions and saving the world from you guessed it, climate change. So the idea of climate lockdowns began to spread. So is this what they're going to try next? Is to lock you down? I still don't understand, because plants create oxygen, Like, why wouldn't you be able to plant? Well, that's why the whole thing of zero carbs yourself, I think is the point. The whole thing of zero carbon means that we have to die. Well, yeah, because we as human I mean, anybody remembers basic science from when they were kids. Right, We breathe out carbon dioxide and plants take that in, and plants expel oxygen, which we take in. So it's a symbiotic relationship between us and plants. So for you to live in a zero carbon environment, basically it means we all have to die because we all produce carbon when we breathe carbon dioxide. So it's impossible to get to that. I mean, that's a fact. And I'm the first one that always laughs when I hear that, because I'm like, that's absurd, it's impossible. You don't even want to you don't want to get anywhere near that. And then you see this Clark obviously we've talked about, like I stupid to even talk about it. Yeah, why do we have to talk about shit of seven year old you know, elementary kid learns and science. Yeah, because like these people with Gore and Heinz fifty seven, Yeah, Carrie, Carrie, Yeah, they don't understand this. Yeah, well because they obviously are getting paid to do, you know, to make the rest of us. Yeah, But sometimes ideology becomes religion and people becomes zellous, you know, I mean, you really have to. It goes beyond like questioning intelligence. It's like these people have a screw loose. I don't. I don't. How do you get sucked? It's like being in that straight up call. Yeah, like behavior. Well, they've been paid so long to push this agenda, and like you said, maybe they just they truly believe it. Now I don't know. I'm not sure. But the article ends with the endgame is obvious. Control the food, you control the world. So you know, they've attacked everything and everyone. That's why the farmers all over the world are revolting because you know, if they're the climate agenda, they're going after them and their farm equipment and things like that. I mean, you're basically saying, you farmers don't deserve to basically create an income for yourself and support your family because you're hurting the environment. So you know, we're gonna shut you down. And we're not even talking about the cows. You know, the flagelence, but that I don't. And I've read somewhere and this is this was an article somewhere even today. Probably we read so much sometimes that I can't remember where I saw it. It was on the phone. I was probably out in the cigar lounge. But that melting ice. ID think it was the U when said that melting ice is the greatest danger and indicator that there's global warming. Yeah, and then so this article throws out the facts that the ice caps aren't melting, they're thicker. I think they're not. There's no evidence of that, actually the opposite. So it's just like agenda agenda, lie lie lie, Lie, lie lie lie, because you know that's what they do. Well, they want more taxes, more than this because it's like I told you before, there was you know, they tried to put a carbon they put a carbon tax, I believe in Australia. And then because of global warming, and then I think Outgore. Yeah, but in general, you know, the I think the climate was getting people. It was it felt warmer, right, so everybody bought into that lie like farming. Yeah, but we had the ozone Larry. You remember there was evidence of that, right, the big hole. Yeah, that's all people talked about in the late night or eighties and nineties. Yeah, that was old. God. We are we're all going to changed, how we yeah, how we like free on and different gases we used in you know, refrigerators and all these different conditioners. Yeah, even HVAC systems and uh, you know, and they're they're doing it again too, Like there's a new gas I think in the next year or two that's going to be the standard for the US. And it's like super expensive, I guess. But I mean regardless, going back, I mean, it's just like it's something. It's one thing after another and it's healed itself somehow, miraculously it healed itself, right, Yeah, the ozone. Nobody talks about the whole No, that's all you heard about every night on the news for fifteen years. Yep. And in the seventies, I was too too young to remember many ice age, mini ice age, mini ice age, mini ice age, Time Magazine, National Geographic on the news. It's a psyop to gets you to it's just a revolving door of bullshit. Yeah, because again it's to blame you, the average person, for being the problem. The problem. Now they use it as an aspect of controlling the world, the population. And you know, but that's what I was trying to go to. Like with the Australia, I think it was Australia they implemented a carbon tax because you know, people had the belief that, yes, things were getting warmer because their temperature seemed warmer. They were going through lots of droughts and things of that nature. And then but when, but then when things started to change. Australia is arid. Yeah, but when things started to change and people were like, it's not really getting warmer, it's getting colder. You're to talk about because all the fires and stuff. Well no, I think they did have that, but something changed and then the people started to realize it wasn't getting warmer, maybe it started getting colder, whatever it was, and then they revolted and I think they repealed that tax. But that's what they want. They're trying to tax everybody, so they're giving they're trying to find excuses. Well in the country that you have ever recycle, but you have to pay by is it like South Korea or the trash you remember, like you have to pay it's like per bag or something, depending on what's in it or the way. You don't remember that now. So it was almost like a because you see like that what was that Black mirror? Yeah, that show. Yeah, they had the social credit score way back and like the first season, and then this trash bag that man I which I thought you would remember for sure, because you're the one that kept shoving these articles in my face. You don't remember it at all. No, I don't know. I don't remember man that fell flat that was depending on you know, I sound like an idiot. Did you remember the trash can fiasco? It doesn't surprise me the probably. I mean, it's it sounds like they're making people pay to recycle their own trash or it's like, you know, I don't even remember, but I remember being you know, it's along the lines of what we're talking about, but so more on the climate agenda. So don't don't be surprised if at some point in the future they say, you know, you have to be locked down because oh no, the sky's falling and it's your fault. So now you need to be a prisoner in your home. Ay, and trust us. You know, we love gardening, We love growing our own food. We have citrus, different things. I mean, we're down with it. I'm an outdoor person, you know. I love nature. We love nature, We love the environment. I mean, it has nothing, it's it's just a it's ridiculous anymore. We're not anti like I want dirty water and dirty air. Yeah, no, you know it's ridiculous. No does, No, no one does. But it means it's not that's what. It's an argue. It's a it's a point. It's a point of contention in politics, and you know, uh, virtue virtue signaling. It's like everywhere, if you don't push hard enough, you don't give a crap. Yeah. Well, it's kind of like we went back to that one article we were talking about the solar flares. So you know, they happen and everything has a cycle and things of that nature, and you know, we for us to think that, you know, we we make such an impact that we can affect the cycles is just ludicrous. You know. I mean, the planet's been around a lot longer than we have, and it's been through many, many different dramatic things. So you know, I'm not saying we do like as you said, we're not saying we don't pollute, because we do. But and we could you know, be better at taking better care of no, but I mean in people in general, right society. But you know, but I don't think our impact is that large where you know, they're saying that it is so Yeah, I mean the Earth has faced cataclysms, extinction level events, hello, dinosaur, you know, yeah, giant meteor, Yeah, all that stuff, all that good stuff. But I think that's it. Is that it for today, that's it for more. Yeah, we have We're gonna just do some quick highlights and politics. I ran and ran across this also on zero Hedge. But it's via Epic Times that Trump spent nearly fifty million in legal fees in twenty twenty three. That's insane. You know, that's his own money, fifty million dollars. And actually he was throwing money at some other people like Navarro, he was helping out with his I can't remember who else, helping them with the defense funds as well. Yeah, I mean as of right now, he got four months and yeah he's like eighty is Yeah, but he dude like still runs and he's in good shape. But yeah he's an old guy. Yeah, for four months of your life. He's gonna appeal it will probably win because this is unprecedented. Again, yeah, just like Trump today, this appeal appellate court or whatever. I don't know where this is a DC or New York or you know, California. But they're taking away his executive privilege basically for jan six. I believe that. I mean, there's so many lawsuits it's hard to cue. I think it's for that one. Yeah, for saying march peacefully and you know, yeah, orderly to the capitol and make sure everybody hears your voice. Yep. So that was you tried to take over. It was a cue, right, But it'll go to another court and it'll get tossed because then you know, these people they don't understand. Then you can go after judges. You made a bad call. You let this guy go. He murdered nine more people. So this judge is going to jail. You know, that's what Congressman. For passing laws, you can be sued. You're going to go to jail. The people are stupid. You can't get rid of that. Nobody's going to do their job. Yeah, nobody's going to have the cajones to make the hard decisions because what if it goes sideways? Yeah, you know, four years from now, you get thrown in jail. Yeah, the first one. I mean, if it sticks, then my orcis you know, blinking the pres They all need to go to jail. But I find that really interesting and you know, like you said, he's just showing out the millions. Yep. So then moving into the economy, wanted to briefly touch on the jobs report. So apparently it was stellar, right, So this was Friday, last Friday. The article came out February second. It said the Bureau of Labor Statistics surprised everyone when they announced the economy added three hundred and thirty five thousand jobs and the unemployment rate was at three point seven percent, So it was like a huge job add and people were like, wow, the economy must be gangbusters. You know, well, I know for a fact, they don't count. They count the jobs that one person could have, like two three jobs. Yeah, they count that as three people. Yeah, they counted. It is not the one person working three part time jobs or the full time job, and they counted as three jobs. But it's one person, three people exactly. If they looked at it that way, you could say, oh, well, the economy must not be that good because you have one person has to work three jobs because they can't make enough working one. And what about all the people that have disappeared off the worker rules forever? Yeah, during the you know, even before the pandemic. Yeah, but the article goes on to say that, you know, which is not so this is basically playbook because we're entering an election season, right. So it goes on to talk about Steve Ferrara, I don't know, his last name is fer A at Forbes basically noted he reported on a stunning report in October of twenty twelve. This is when Obama was in you know, as President said, just one month before the twenty twelve election, the Obama campaign revealed a major illegal campaign contribution from the Commerce Department. Now the Department of Bureau of Labor Statistics reported on October fifth, twenty twelve, that the nation's unemployment rate suddenly dropped sharply over the prior month, from eight point one percent to seven point eight That supposedly ended the longest period in the longest period in the nation's history with unemployment over eight percent. So those who think, you know, with Obama the economy was so great, now we had the longest period of you know, eight years were horrible. Yeah, they were eight over eight percent unemployment. Except so that was the longest period of nation's history except for the Great Depression, which was a little worse, right, and that was under Obama. So just like before, how convenient that all these labor numbers are looking so great right before an election, right, we know, since I mean they they change how they evaluated everything just to make themselves look shiny. Yeah, and that's a fact. And that's Republican and Democrat, that's both parties. And then this goes to something I read again in early January from Armstrong Economics, and it says, you know, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has fabricated nearly one third of newly created jobs in twenty twenty three. I saw that somewhere too, So nearly a third of all jobs supposedly that were created were fake. But then what people don't really pay attention to is this is but this has been common for decades. Is they'll release their number and they'll say, oh, this is the job number for so since it was released in early January or February was a January number. So when they release in early March for February, they will revise January's number, right, So most people don't go and look at the revision. They only look at the new headline number. Right. So in these revisions though, that's what So they've gone back and revised, of course, lower to the real number, not the fake headline number. So that's why we're telling you. Watch the news and what they're saying to you. So, I mean, that's crazy if one third of the jobs were basically revised away for all of twenty twenty three, so yay government. Yeah, and that's according to a research fellow a Heritage Foundation. So crazy. But I'm with the government. I'm here to help. Yes, Love Reagan, give us the best, the words you don't want to hear. Yeah, knocking your door, all right, And then I just wanted real quick to it's not I don't know if you people could tell. I've been trying to get like out of here for a while. She keeps throwing curveballs at me. It was one last one. It was just, you know, Pal tells sixty minutes that the Fed is quote not likely to cut in March. So I just want to let everybody know that your interest rates. Yeah, it was kind of promising that though. Well it's been on the major if you listen to major, well, the major news has been saying, oh, he's going to cut rates, and I mean, every time you hear it constantly cut rates, and he's he's like pause, pause, pause. You know, he's been saying pause most of the time. But now he's basically said, it's not likely to cut in March. It's not likely they're going to cut out. You can't cut now, we'll go into a depression. Right, Well, we'll spin out of control. No, they just right now when you have well, they can't. They're not going to cut because you know, we've been spending. What people don't understand is that the FED is a is a one trick pony. So they only have one thing that they can do, and that's razor lower the interest rates. They do not control the monetary policy, only the interest rate. Right, So it's the treasury and the government that says, I want to spend, spend, spend, spend, spend. So well, all we're doing, I mean, they're just printing the money they're giving to like you see that builder trying to pass yeah, twenty billion to the border sixty to fricking in Ukraine. It's called the Border Protection Actors and they're putting more to the Ukraine. Yeah, and that in Israel. And I'm just like and all he will do is turn the machine on and print the money. And that's exactly why the FED cannot cut right, because you can't print that kind of money and not expect inflation. So if the FED is a one one, one trick pony and they can only do one thing to keep inflation and check, they have to keep rates up. So they may not raise the rates, but they aren't going to cut them, so know that. I mean, I just don't see how they They're so creative. They must be just very creative because look at the seventies, you know, interest rates were wacky, like nobody could buy a house because of the interest Yeah, and they had to raise the rates. That's because they so look at us, why aren't we hitting these numbers? You know, I don't understand it. Well, the economy is also bigger, so you know, but I mean, I know that the FED would want to lower interest rates because I just heard this number, which most people know this, well maybe not, but a lot of people. You'd be surprised to realize that. You know, we had a trillion dollars in the deficit under Reagan, and it was like crazy. Everybody's like, oh my gosh. You know, it's like freaking out one trillion, but we pay one trillion in interest today. Wow, we have over thirty We are what al must probably in the I mean definitely over thirty five. I think trillion now are very close, maybe more, But we pay a trillion dollars in interest. Yeah, we're probably closer to forty. We're we're in that classic mathematical hockey stick curve. So you get to a point in that car. No, so it's basically it runs like almost kind of straight for a long time and then shoot straight up, so you reach a point where it's going to double and triple and quadruple at astronomical speeds. So we are getting there, and you know that's why it's been growing so fast. Nobody cares anymore. No, that's essentially yeah, nobody just nobody cares. Well, everybody expects them to just to print money, so they're like, oh, just print it, that's gonna happen. I mean, the only reason we're like the only country people can put their money in still. Well, as Martin likes to say, Martin Armstea, once they stopped. Once we're not the place where you put the money. Then we no longer have an economy that's stable, right, Yeah, he said, you know, we're the least ugly of the ugly sisters. So everybody, everybody in the developed world is in the same boat that we're in with excessive debt. Right, so at some point you can't continue to print. And because we're keep printing, people think it's going to go on forever, but it can't. You know, at some point, nobody's gonna want to trust the government enough to buy their bonds because I don't remember that that's how the government raises money through bonds, so they need to get the money from somewhere. Yeah, in ten years, all the Americans will be like invading Argentina because that dude'll have his stuff together. Yeah, exactly, They'll be the rich country that will be. You know, like we got to move to argently, going through Mexica, getting out of our fence, trying to get into New Mexico. We'll have a fence up, yeah, so we can get it down. At least the weather would be better, yeah, somewhat northern. Yeah, So but I guess that's it. That's it. And see, I was buying time. I was trying to get to the forty minute Mark, I didn't know you had more coming. That's why I was talking a little too much. I was like, I want to say, I gotta push that the forty minutes and you're like again, no, no, no. I was like, damn it, all right, everyone, pretty interesting, show, a little different. We'll see how this, uh, this new structure works out for us. But like I said, you can email us crazy Strange Days at gmail dot com. Days is not d A y S. It's da ze. Excuse me. Please subscribe, share the show, five star, rate and review. I think that's about it. Good night and good night, good night folks. Love you, peace,
ai,companies,likely",recognition,still,tesla,"not,tsa,east,books,contaminated,cooking,facial,palestine,statistics,cut,fed,labor,to,turn,